Casino Spam Sms
2021年4月8日Register here: http://gg.gg/oyo71
*Casino Spam Sms Message
*Casino Spam Sms App
*Casino Scams Slot Machines
A lot of people ask me if there is a CAN-SPAM Act for wireless text messaging. In other words, are there any laws that pertain to sending spam to a cell phone? The answer is yes and no. Confused yet? If you have a strict attorney but would like to to take advantage of this explosive marketing medium, then this article is for you. Let me walk you through how this message type is currently regulated.
There are two types of “text messages” that can be sent to a cell phone:Casino Spam Sms Message
1. SMTP: Otherwise known as Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, this is the same protocol used when sending an email. Cell phones are able to receive text messages in the form of an email. Casino near jupiter florida. A lot of carriers still support this. For instance, to send an email text message to a Cingular customer, you would email their 10digitmobilenumber@mobile.mycingular.com
Playamo Casino - SMS Spam. Overview Discussion; Other Complaints (93) Complaint Info. Disputed casino: Playamo Casino: Reason: Other: Unsolicitedsms. You can literally spam someone’s phone with texts or phone calls for up to 24 hours. The user will never know who sent the prank, which makes it perfect for when you need to stay anonymous! You can even send your own custom message if you want to, but we found the default text messages they send are really funny. With 300,000 bots, Maazben spreads two and a half billion casino-related spam messages per day. 8: Xarvester (Rlsloup/Pixoliz) Xarvester came into the picture after the McColo shutdown.
*I have explained them that the only type of promotions which I ever been accepting was PROMOTIONS via mobile SMS (and not over the phone) - this is my policy when I register to any gambling website: I tell them via Live Chat (or via email) that I want to have all promotions turned off except the ones sent via SMS, and from my experience I can.
*SMS payments allow users to make casino deposits using their mobile phones with the amount being subtracted from their phone bill or pre-paid card. One of thier biggest advantages is that they does not require any credit or debit card information and that the users’ personal details remain unrevealed.
2. SMPP: This is now the preferred method of text messaging, where the message gets routed through a gateway that connects directly to the carrier. This protocol is also known as Short Message Peer-to-Peer.
Our company’s product, Stun!, delivered text messages via SMTP for quite awhile but recently we switched to SMPP for a number of reasons. For one, SMPP is secure and is sent over a VPN (Virtual Private Network) connection with the specific carrier attached to the message recipient. The carrier collects a toll on every message sent, which means that your message has a much higher likelihood of being received correctly than an SMTP-based one, which isn’t routed through the carrier. As a result, the carriers also give you more information as to which numbers are good and bad (a.k.a bounces). Finally, the protocol has two-way capabilities so your subscribers can respond to your message as well as receive them.
Overall, SMPP has a ton of more features and is the right way to go if you are providing marketers with a feature-rich and scalable platform. Now that we’ve covered the differences between the SMS protocols, let’s talk about how these messages are regulated. We’ll be begin with our favorite, the CAN-SPAM Act.
CAN-SPAM Act and Text Messaging
In 2003, Congress enacted the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act to curb spam. As required by the Act, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules that prohibit sending unwanted commercial e-mail messages to wireless devices without prior permission. This ban took effect in March 2005. The FCC’s ban covered messages sent to cell phones and pagers, if the message used an Internet address that included an Internet domain name (as seen in my Cingular example above). The FCC’s ban did not cover “short messages,” typically sent from one mobile phone to another, that do not use an Internet address (such as an SMPP message).
To help enforce its ban, the FCC required wireless service providers to provide all Internet domain names used to transmit electronic messages to wireless devices. The FCC published this list on its Web site at www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy/DomainNameDownload.html. Senders were prohibited from sending commercial e-mail messages to any Internet domain name on this list without the recipient’s express prior authorization.
In other words, SMTP protocol is pretty heavily regulated when it comes to sending messages to subscribers who did not give their “express prior authorization.” However, the CAN-SPAM Act provided no regulation when it came to SMPP protocol. Still, that doesn’t mean that you are free and clear with SMPP, thanks in large part to a widely interpreted television consumer protection act from 1991.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act:
One of the articles of The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), includes sending text messages to cell phones using an automatic telephone dialing system. The TCPA prohibits the sending of such messages “to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged” 47 U.S.C. 227 (b)(1)(A)(iii). The FCC has made it clear that without the prior express consent of the called party, the TCPA prohibits any callusing an automatic telephone dialing system to any wireless telephone number. This prohibition encompasses both voice calls and text calls, including SMS messages sent to wireless phone numbers.
While it might be argued that that the SMPP protocol is not an automatic telephone dialing system, this is still a gray area. Moreover, the underlying directive of the TCPA can be easily extended to include the SMPP protocol, which didn’t exist when the law was initially instated. The intent of the TCPA is to make sure that consumers expressly consent to automated calls or messages sent to wireless devices given that consumers may be charged to receive such calls or messages, which can also be intrusive. Since the act covers such a wide range of devices (at the time, wireless messages were meant for pagers), it is definitely possible that newer wireless technology also falls under these general guidelines. The key is again is the notion “express written consent”, which, in the case of text messaging, means some sort of opt-in proof. Fortunately, Stun! users already have this protection built into the application so meeting these requirements is a very simple matter.
Conclusion:
I am sure in the future will see more federally regulated laws that will be more technology specific. Most of the regulations proposed today are being driven by the carriers themselves as well as wireless content and messaging companies. It’s a necessary step to make sure that the government doesn’t outlaw such messaging altogether, which is always possible. Currently, the main organization that manages industry standards is the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA). It is important when selecting a service provider for text messaging that their platform is compliant with industry standards and carrier requirements. Most importantly though, no matter what platform or protocol you are using, make sure that you are obtaining the proper permissions to send someone marketing text messages or you run the risk of being blocked or worse in the future when the FCC will inevitably start to levy fines as they do with the CAN-SPAM Act. Being a good mobile marketing “citizen” is very important these days and can go a long way to making sure you are getting the most out of this exciting and dynamic communication vehicle.
For more information on mobileStorm’s text messaging services, visit mobileStorm’s product overview.
Jared Reitzin
CEO
mobileStorm Inc.
Business Entrepreneur Blogonlinecasinoselite.org › Blog › Top 7 Recent Casino Scams CASINO GAME RULES
Casinos being a prime and open place to make money have been a subject of heist and break-ins. However, there have been many people who thought one-step ahead of what a regular robber would think of. These masterminds’ succeeded in scamming some of the topmost casinos of the world, and even so, they remained successful to avoid arrest for quite sometime.
Let’s move ahead and see the top 7 recent casino scams.
*Ritz Casino Scam
It was the year 2004, when three super genius gamblers were able to get a whopping £1.3 million from London’s most famous Ritz Club Casino. The trio made use of the laser technology to calculate the winning numbers for the roulette. The scanner was supposedly connected to a computer with software that could figure out the landing number for the roulette ball. The trio was arrested, however no charges were applied. Apparently, the “sector targeting” theory is not considered cheating.Cutter Gang
2011 was the year when police was actively looking for “cutter gang”. The team worked impeccably to take away millions of dollars from the baccarat table. This time also technology was apparently their big time helper. A player wore a very small camera, which was fitted inside the cufflink. The camera was to record the card values, which were then meticulously used by another player to cut the deck. Authorities had to let them go after no solid evidence was found after their arrest in Cosmopolitan Casino, Las Vegas.Crown Casino Scam
The most famous casino of Melbourne, Australia, Crown Casino was robbed off $33 million AUD in 2013. The case is still open because the unknown subject(s) could not be traced back. Apparently the unknown person successfully hacked the surveillance system to carry out the heist. The scam seems to be carried out by more than 2 people. The details of the scam have not been shared by the casino officially, however they are determined to get back all of their money.Contact Lens Scam
Year 2011, Cannes – 64,000 Euros were conned from a well known Cannes Casino, Les Princes Casino. The players, a Frenchman and 3 Italians used invisible ink marking and high-tech contact lenses to carry out the scam. During the game session of stud poker, the Frenchman used invisible ink to make a line for ace and cross for king on the cards. The Italians used their special contact lenses to see these symbols on the card. Unfortunately, their winning seemed fishy and police was called upon. They were arrested and are going to be in prison for long time.1 Minute ATM Casino Scam
14 people were arrested for the theft of more than $1 million in 2012, using their Citibank debit card. Headed by Ara Keshishyan, the team opened multiple checking accounts with Citibank. The team then used the debit card all over the Las Vegas and Southern California casino ATMs to withdraw 10 times the original deposited money. There was a 1 minute withdrawal window that allowed them to carry out many unrecorded withdrawals. The withdrawn money was then split for gambling. Ara Keshishyan was arrested for million dollar bank fraud.Roulette Ring Scam, New York
A group of almost 70 people was charged with the Roulette Ring Scam, New York in 2012. The group consisted of many players who would place extremely low bets per chip for the game. While few players were busy distracting the dealer, the others played on with colored chips. These chips were basically used to cash out high value on other tables - $1000-$2000 per cheat. Although only 4 people were arrested (who also pled guilty) for the scam, there’s a speculation that the group was much bigger.
The Roselli Brothers Scam
A group of con artists made $37 million during a 5 year span from 1995 to 2000. These artists called themselves “The Roselli Brothers”, who raked the casinos of Nevada, New Jersey and Puerto Rico using the identity theft scheme. The brothers were accompanied by a computer hacker who was able to find people with remarkable credits. Using their identity, the brothers opened bank accounts with an investment of $50,000 and in return they got access to the credit lines of all the major casinos. While the scamming was going on for almost 5 years, it was in the year 2000, when the FBI managed to figure out about the heist, only to find out that the real Roselli brothers were dead.
Considering the fact that most of the scams go unaccounted or unsolved due to the lack of evidence, these genius casino scams made it to the list that took place in the recent years.
What Else Might Interest You:Online Roulette - Some basics for beginners Although roulette is truly a game of chance, it should be analyzed carefully to increase the probability.. read moreTop 10 Online Casinos Based on the tests done last year, here is the list of the top 10 online casinos which onlinecasinoselite.org.. read moreCasino Jack - a new film by George HickenlooperCasino Spam Sms App Casino Jack (2010 - Director: George Hickenlooper) One of the most exciting and watchable film, Casino.. read moreGaming and Gambling: The Differences Gaming is a broad umbrella term for a number of types of play or activity. It includes gambling in many.. read moreCasino Scams Slot Machines
COMMENTS:
By loading and joining the Disqus comments service below, you agree to their privacy policy.Please enable javascript to view the Page Comments powered by Disqus.
Register here: http://gg.gg/oyo71
https://diarynote.indered.space
*Casino Spam Sms Message
*Casino Spam Sms App
*Casino Scams Slot Machines
A lot of people ask me if there is a CAN-SPAM Act for wireless text messaging. In other words, are there any laws that pertain to sending spam to a cell phone? The answer is yes and no. Confused yet? If you have a strict attorney but would like to to take advantage of this explosive marketing medium, then this article is for you. Let me walk you through how this message type is currently regulated.
There are two types of “text messages” that can be sent to a cell phone:Casino Spam Sms Message
1. SMTP: Otherwise known as Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, this is the same protocol used when sending an email. Cell phones are able to receive text messages in the form of an email. Casino near jupiter florida. A lot of carriers still support this. For instance, to send an email text message to a Cingular customer, you would email their 10digitmobilenumber@mobile.mycingular.com
Playamo Casino - SMS Spam. Overview Discussion; Other Complaints (93) Complaint Info. Disputed casino: Playamo Casino: Reason: Other: Unsolicitedsms. You can literally spam someone’s phone with texts or phone calls for up to 24 hours. The user will never know who sent the prank, which makes it perfect for when you need to stay anonymous! You can even send your own custom message if you want to, but we found the default text messages they send are really funny. With 300,000 bots, Maazben spreads two and a half billion casino-related spam messages per day. 8: Xarvester (Rlsloup/Pixoliz) Xarvester came into the picture after the McColo shutdown.
*I have explained them that the only type of promotions which I ever been accepting was PROMOTIONS via mobile SMS (and not over the phone) - this is my policy when I register to any gambling website: I tell them via Live Chat (or via email) that I want to have all promotions turned off except the ones sent via SMS, and from my experience I can.
*SMS payments allow users to make casino deposits using their mobile phones with the amount being subtracted from their phone bill or pre-paid card. One of thier biggest advantages is that they does not require any credit or debit card information and that the users’ personal details remain unrevealed.
2. SMPP: This is now the preferred method of text messaging, where the message gets routed through a gateway that connects directly to the carrier. This protocol is also known as Short Message Peer-to-Peer.
Our company’s product, Stun!, delivered text messages via SMTP for quite awhile but recently we switched to SMPP for a number of reasons. For one, SMPP is secure and is sent over a VPN (Virtual Private Network) connection with the specific carrier attached to the message recipient. The carrier collects a toll on every message sent, which means that your message has a much higher likelihood of being received correctly than an SMTP-based one, which isn’t routed through the carrier. As a result, the carriers also give you more information as to which numbers are good and bad (a.k.a bounces). Finally, the protocol has two-way capabilities so your subscribers can respond to your message as well as receive them.
Overall, SMPP has a ton of more features and is the right way to go if you are providing marketers with a feature-rich and scalable platform. Now that we’ve covered the differences between the SMS protocols, let’s talk about how these messages are regulated. We’ll be begin with our favorite, the CAN-SPAM Act.
CAN-SPAM Act and Text Messaging
In 2003, Congress enacted the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act to curb spam. As required by the Act, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules that prohibit sending unwanted commercial e-mail messages to wireless devices without prior permission. This ban took effect in March 2005. The FCC’s ban covered messages sent to cell phones and pagers, if the message used an Internet address that included an Internet domain name (as seen in my Cingular example above). The FCC’s ban did not cover “short messages,” typically sent from one mobile phone to another, that do not use an Internet address (such as an SMPP message).
To help enforce its ban, the FCC required wireless service providers to provide all Internet domain names used to transmit electronic messages to wireless devices. The FCC published this list on its Web site at www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy/DomainNameDownload.html. Senders were prohibited from sending commercial e-mail messages to any Internet domain name on this list without the recipient’s express prior authorization.
In other words, SMTP protocol is pretty heavily regulated when it comes to sending messages to subscribers who did not give their “express prior authorization.” However, the CAN-SPAM Act provided no regulation when it came to SMPP protocol. Still, that doesn’t mean that you are free and clear with SMPP, thanks in large part to a widely interpreted television consumer protection act from 1991.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act:
One of the articles of The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), includes sending text messages to cell phones using an automatic telephone dialing system. The TCPA prohibits the sending of such messages “to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged” 47 U.S.C. 227 (b)(1)(A)(iii). The FCC has made it clear that without the prior express consent of the called party, the TCPA prohibits any callusing an automatic telephone dialing system to any wireless telephone number. This prohibition encompasses both voice calls and text calls, including SMS messages sent to wireless phone numbers.
While it might be argued that that the SMPP protocol is not an automatic telephone dialing system, this is still a gray area. Moreover, the underlying directive of the TCPA can be easily extended to include the SMPP protocol, which didn’t exist when the law was initially instated. The intent of the TCPA is to make sure that consumers expressly consent to automated calls or messages sent to wireless devices given that consumers may be charged to receive such calls or messages, which can also be intrusive. Since the act covers such a wide range of devices (at the time, wireless messages were meant for pagers), it is definitely possible that newer wireless technology also falls under these general guidelines. The key is again is the notion “express written consent”, which, in the case of text messaging, means some sort of opt-in proof. Fortunately, Stun! users already have this protection built into the application so meeting these requirements is a very simple matter.
Conclusion:
I am sure in the future will see more federally regulated laws that will be more technology specific. Most of the regulations proposed today are being driven by the carriers themselves as well as wireless content and messaging companies. It’s a necessary step to make sure that the government doesn’t outlaw such messaging altogether, which is always possible. Currently, the main organization that manages industry standards is the Mobile Marketing Association (MMA). It is important when selecting a service provider for text messaging that their platform is compliant with industry standards and carrier requirements. Most importantly though, no matter what platform or protocol you are using, make sure that you are obtaining the proper permissions to send someone marketing text messages or you run the risk of being blocked or worse in the future when the FCC will inevitably start to levy fines as they do with the CAN-SPAM Act. Being a good mobile marketing “citizen” is very important these days and can go a long way to making sure you are getting the most out of this exciting and dynamic communication vehicle.
For more information on mobileStorm’s text messaging services, visit mobileStorm’s product overview.
Jared Reitzin
CEO
mobileStorm Inc.
Business Entrepreneur Blogonlinecasinoselite.org › Blog › Top 7 Recent Casino Scams CASINO GAME RULES
Casinos being a prime and open place to make money have been a subject of heist and break-ins. However, there have been many people who thought one-step ahead of what a regular robber would think of. These masterminds’ succeeded in scamming some of the topmost casinos of the world, and even so, they remained successful to avoid arrest for quite sometime.
Let’s move ahead and see the top 7 recent casino scams.
*Ritz Casino Scam
It was the year 2004, when three super genius gamblers were able to get a whopping £1.3 million from London’s most famous Ritz Club Casino. The trio made use of the laser technology to calculate the winning numbers for the roulette. The scanner was supposedly connected to a computer with software that could figure out the landing number for the roulette ball. The trio was arrested, however no charges were applied. Apparently, the “sector targeting” theory is not considered cheating.Cutter Gang
2011 was the year when police was actively looking for “cutter gang”. The team worked impeccably to take away millions of dollars from the baccarat table. This time also technology was apparently their big time helper. A player wore a very small camera, which was fitted inside the cufflink. The camera was to record the card values, which were then meticulously used by another player to cut the deck. Authorities had to let them go after no solid evidence was found after their arrest in Cosmopolitan Casino, Las Vegas.Crown Casino Scam
The most famous casino of Melbourne, Australia, Crown Casino was robbed off $33 million AUD in 2013. The case is still open because the unknown subject(s) could not be traced back. Apparently the unknown person successfully hacked the surveillance system to carry out the heist. The scam seems to be carried out by more than 2 people. The details of the scam have not been shared by the casino officially, however they are determined to get back all of their money.Contact Lens Scam
Year 2011, Cannes – 64,000 Euros were conned from a well known Cannes Casino, Les Princes Casino. The players, a Frenchman and 3 Italians used invisible ink marking and high-tech contact lenses to carry out the scam. During the game session of stud poker, the Frenchman used invisible ink to make a line for ace and cross for king on the cards. The Italians used their special contact lenses to see these symbols on the card. Unfortunately, their winning seemed fishy and police was called upon. They were arrested and are going to be in prison for long time.1 Minute ATM Casino Scam
14 people were arrested for the theft of more than $1 million in 2012, using their Citibank debit card. Headed by Ara Keshishyan, the team opened multiple checking accounts with Citibank. The team then used the debit card all over the Las Vegas and Southern California casino ATMs to withdraw 10 times the original deposited money. There was a 1 minute withdrawal window that allowed them to carry out many unrecorded withdrawals. The withdrawn money was then split for gambling. Ara Keshishyan was arrested for million dollar bank fraud.Roulette Ring Scam, New York
A group of almost 70 people was charged with the Roulette Ring Scam, New York in 2012. The group consisted of many players who would place extremely low bets per chip for the game. While few players were busy distracting the dealer, the others played on with colored chips. These chips were basically used to cash out high value on other tables - $1000-$2000 per cheat. Although only 4 people were arrested (who also pled guilty) for the scam, there’s a speculation that the group was much bigger.
The Roselli Brothers Scam
A group of con artists made $37 million during a 5 year span from 1995 to 2000. These artists called themselves “The Roselli Brothers”, who raked the casinos of Nevada, New Jersey and Puerto Rico using the identity theft scheme. The brothers were accompanied by a computer hacker who was able to find people with remarkable credits. Using their identity, the brothers opened bank accounts with an investment of $50,000 and in return they got access to the credit lines of all the major casinos. While the scamming was going on for almost 5 years, it was in the year 2000, when the FBI managed to figure out about the heist, only to find out that the real Roselli brothers were dead.
Considering the fact that most of the scams go unaccounted or unsolved due to the lack of evidence, these genius casino scams made it to the list that took place in the recent years.
What Else Might Interest You:Online Roulette - Some basics for beginners Although roulette is truly a game of chance, it should be analyzed carefully to increase the probability.. read moreTop 10 Online Casinos Based on the tests done last year, here is the list of the top 10 online casinos which onlinecasinoselite.org.. read moreCasino Jack - a new film by George HickenlooperCasino Spam Sms App Casino Jack (2010 - Director: George Hickenlooper) One of the most exciting and watchable film, Casino.. read moreGaming and Gambling: The Differences Gaming is a broad umbrella term for a number of types of play or activity. It includes gambling in many.. read moreCasino Scams Slot Machines
COMMENTS:
By loading and joining the Disqus comments service below, you agree to their privacy policy.Please enable javascript to view the Page Comments powered by Disqus.
Register here: http://gg.gg/oyo71
https://diarynote.indered.space
コメント